PENINGKATAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP FISIKA DAN AKTIVITAS MAHASISWA MELALUI PhET SIMULATION

(1) * Elisa Elisa Mail (Pendidikan Fisika, FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan, Indonesia)
(2) Ainun Mardiyah Mail (Pendidikan Fisika, FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan, Indonesia)
(3) Rizky Ariaji Mail (Pendidikan Kimia, FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan, Indonesia)
*corresponding author

Abstract


Understanding the concept as one of the keys to success in studying science especially Physics, so do not have to memorize the formula but enough just by understanding the concept alone. Based on observations during community research activities, some positive results were obtained: Participants showed very high attention to the material using PhET Simulation.From the preliminary test in cycle I the pretest score of about 10% is able to answer to 77.5%, while in cycle II the value of the dropper about 20% increased to 97.5%. While for the activity of students which cover the realm of ability to use PhET Simulation from 73,75% in cycle I increase to 85% in cycle II, Inenthusiasm Attitude enthusiasm using PhET Simulation from 75% in cycle I increased to 86,25% in cycle II, In the field of cooperation in the group using PhET Simulation of 72.5% in the first cycle increased to 86.25% in cycle II. In the realm of the ability to use worksheets in PhET Simulation from 75% in cycleI increased to 88.75% in cycle II. In the sphere of participation in the discussion using PhET Simulation from 75% in the first cycle increased to 86.25% in cycle II. The result of the research is the increasing of concept comprehension and the increasing of student learning activity.

Keywords:PhET Simulation, Conceptual Understanding, Learning Activities

   

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31604/ptk.v1i1.15-20
      

Article metrics

10.31604/ptk.v1i1.15-20 Abstract views : 1 | PDF views : 0

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

References


Budhu, M. (2002). Virtual Laboratories for Engineering Education. Paper Presented at international conference of engineering Education. Manchester, U. K. Agustus, p.

Brok, P. D., Taconis, R. dan Fisher, D. (2010). How well do Science Teacher Do?Differences in teacher-student interpersonal behavior between Science Teachers and teachers of other (school) Subjects. The open education Journal,3.

Depdiknas, (2002), SPTK-21, Jakarta.

Dahar, Ratna Wilis, DR. (1988). Teori – Teori Belajar. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta.

Finkelstein, et.al. (2005). When Learning About the real World is better done Virtually ; A study of substituting Computer Simulations for Laboratory Equipmentâ€. Physics Education Research. APS (1).

Gok, T. &Silay.,I..(2008). Effect of Problem Solving Strategy Teaching on the problemsolvingattitude of cooperative learning group. Journal ofTheory and practice in education. 4(2).

Wahyudi.(2006). Upaya peningkatan prestasi belajar Fisika dengan memvisualkan konsep Fisika dalam kehidupan nyata sehari-hari. Jurnal Dinamika pendidikan.

Walsh, L. N., Howard, R. G..& Bowe, B.. (2007). Phenomegraphy Study of Students` Problem Solving Approach in Physics. Physics Education Reasearch (online). 3 (2).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PeTeKa (Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran)
UM-Tapsel Press : Institusional Publisher | Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan
http://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/ptk
email : peteka@um-tapsel.ac.id

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.