ONTOGENICAL OBSTACLE PESERTA DIDIK DALAM MEMPELAJARI HUBUNGAN ANTAR SUDUT SALING BERPENYIKU KELAS VII SMP

Ayathollah Khomeni, Yuni Rhamayanti

Abstract


Abstract Mathematics consists of several sections of science concentration, one of which is geometry. Lines and angles are the most basic geometric material studied by students at the Junior High School (SMP) level in class VII. Lines and angles are basic material that is very important for students to understand as a basis for understanding subsequent geometry material. Ontogenic obstacles (ontegic obstacles) are one of the obstacles related to students' mental readiness in terms of the limited knowledge possessed by students, both in terms of application context and in terms of cognitive maturity in accepting new knowledge. The aim of the research is to analyze the types of ontogenic obstacles identified by students in learning the material about lines and angles in the sub-discussion of angles. The method used in this research is a qualitative method with a Didactical Design  Research model approach through retrospective analysis. Data collection in research applies triangulation techniques, namely through observation, documentation and interviews. The results of this research indicate that students experience learning obstacles of the ontogenic type in learning the relationship between angles at angles school in line and angle material class VII SMP.


Keywords


Ontogenical Obstacle dan Sudut Saling Berpenyiku

Full Text:

PDF

References


Argaswari, D.P.A.D., & Usodo, B. (2015). Analisis kesulitan Belajar Geometri Kelas VII SMP Pokok Bahasan Sifat Sudut yang Terbentuk dari Dua Garis Sejajar yang Berpotongan dengan Garis lain. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. Hlm. 413-422. UNY.

Biber, C., Tuna, A., & Korkmaz, S. (2013). The Mistakes and the Misconceptions of the Eighth Grade Students on the Subject of Angles. European Journal of science and mathematics education, 1(2), 50-59.

Brousseau, G. (2002). Epistemological obstacles, problems, and didactical engineering. Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics: Didactique des Mathématiques, 1970–1990, 79-117.

Browning, C., Edson, A. J., Kimani, P., & Aslan-Tutak, F. (2014). Mathematical content knowledge for teaching elementary mathematics: A focus on geometry and measurement. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(2), 333-383.

Clements, D. H., & Burns, B. A. (2000). Students' development of strategies for turn and angle measure. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(1), 31-45.

Koyunkaya, M. Y. (2018). An examination of a pre-service mathematics teacher's mental constructions of relationships in a right triangle. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 6(1), 58-78.

Mitchelmore, M. C., & White, P. (2000). Development of angle concepts by progressive abstraction and generalisation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(3), 209-238.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Executive Summary: Principles and Standards for Shcool Mathematics, Virginia:USA.

Nurianti, E., Halini, & Ijudin, R. (2015). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Materi Pecahan Bentuk Aljabar di Kelas VIII SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(9), 1-10.

Prescott, A., Mitchelmore, M., & White, P. (2002). Student Difficulties in Abstracting Angle Concepts from Physical Activities with Concrete Materials.

Suryadi, D. (2018). Landasan filosofis penelitian desain didaktis (DDR). Makalah Bahan Diskusi di Lingkungan Departemen Pendidikan Matematika FPMIPA UPI, Januari 2018.

Sherard, W. H. (1981). Why is geometry a basic skill?. The Mathematics Teacher, 74(1), 19-60.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31604/eksakta.v9i1.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.