VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS INSTRUMEN TES MATEMATIKA DASAR II YANG BERKAITAN DENGAN LlSTRIK MAGNET

Aminah Harahap

Abstract


Abstract Development research test instrument math base II on introduction nuclear Listrik Magnetics lecture has been done. The method used is quantitative descriptive stages as follows: (1) Review basic math content that is relevant to the related nuclear physics through the study of literature; (2) Prepare draft test instruments with reference to the objectives, competence standard, basic competence, and indicators of achievement of design lectures were arranged; (3) Ask the expert assessment (validation construction and content); (4) To test the test instrument in a limited scope, evaluate and improve the existing deficiencies. The amount of matter that is developed in this test is 30 grains form the description. Data analysis test results of this test instruments in the group of students showed that the validity criteria are high, which is equal to 0.77. The instrument reliability was 0.87 which included a very high category. This means the resulting product meets the decent criteria, because validan reliable, but there are still items that need revision based on suggestions and feedback from the validator.


Keywords


Instrumen tes mathematic II, validity, reliability.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ary, D., Jacobs,L.C.,(2010).

Introduction to Research in Education (8th Ed). Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning

Blumenthal, R. H. (1961). Multiple instruction and other factors related to achievement in college physics. Science Education, 45, 336–342.

Brito, C. F. Sharma, A., & Bernas, R. S. (2004). Assessing Student Learning Using A Local Comprehensive Exam: Insights From Eastern Illinois University.

Measuring Up Educational Assessment Challenges and Practices for Psychology. Edited by Dunn, D. S., Mehrotra, C. M., & Halonen, J. S.

Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

Brown, G., Bull, J., & Pedlebury, M. (1997). Assessing Student in Higher Eduation. London dan New York: Routledge.

Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979).

Reliability and Validity Assessment. Iowa City: Sage Publications, Inc.

Charles, C. M. (1995). Introduction to educational research (2ndEd.). San Diego, Longman.

Cohen H. D., Hillman, D. F., & Agne, R. M. (1978). Cognitive level and college physics achievement. American Journal of Physics, 46, 1026–1029.

Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Toronto: Holt, Rine Hart, and Winston, Inc.

David, Ruth. (2011). Practical Statistics for Educators. Lanham, Maryland – USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc

Ebel, R. L. & Frisbie, D. A. (1991).

Essensials Of Educational Measurement, 5th Ed. New Delhi: Prentice Hall.

Gipps, C. V. (1994). Beyond Testing: Towards a Theory of Educational Assessment. Washington DC: The Falmer Press.

Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 8, 597– 60.

ladyna, T, M. (2004). Developing And Validating Multiple-Choice Test Items 3rd Edition. New Jersey London: Mahwah.

Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2007). Fundamentals of Physics 8th Ed. Canada: John Wiley & Sons Canada.

Halloun, I. A. & Hestenes, D. (1985). The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics, 53, 1043–1055.

Hudson, H. T., & McIntire, W. R. (1977).

American Journal of Physics, 45, 470-471.

Hudson, H. T. & Rottmann, R. M. (1981). Correlation Between Performance In Physics And Prior Mathematics Knowledge. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, 18 (4), 291-294.

Indrawati, S. W. (2009). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Psikologis Berbasis Tik. Jurnal Penelitian, 9 (1).

Jandaghi, G. (2011). Assessment of Validity, Reliability and Difficulty Indices for Teacher-built Physics Exam Questions in First Year High School. Arts and Social Sciences Journal, 2011, ASSJ-16.

Kereh, C. T., Sabandar, J, & Tjiang, P. C. (2013). Identifikasi Kesulitan Belajar Mahasiswa dalam Konten Matematika pada Materi Pendahuluan Listrik Magnet.

Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains dan Pendidikan Sains VIII UKSW, 9 – 15.

Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research.

Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. Kubiszyn, T., dan Borich, G. (2013).

Educational Testing and Measurement: Classroom Application and Practice 10th Ed. Jefferson City: John Wiley & Sons. Lang, H. (2009). Head First Physics.

Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media, Inc.,Maloney, D. P., O’Kuma, T. L., Mehren, A. M., & Lehmann, I. J. (1991). Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology. USA: Ted Buchholz.

Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible ‘‘hidden variable’’ in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics 70 ~12.

Popham, W. J. (1990). Modern Educational Measurement: A Practitioner’s Perspective 2 nd Ed. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.

Quale, A. (2011). On the Role of Mathematics in Physics: A Constructivist Epistemic Perspective. Science & Education .

Van Saane, N., Sluiter, J. K., Verbeek, J. H., & Frings-Dresen, M. H. (2003).

Reliability and validity of instruments measuring job satisfaction - a systematic review. Occupational Medicine, 53(3), 191-200.

Wass, V., Van der Vleuten, C., Shatzer, J., & Jones, R. (2001). Assessment of clinicalcompetence. The Lancet 357(9260), 945-949.

Widodo, W. (2010). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran “Mikir” Pada Perkuliahan Fisika Dasar Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Generik Sains Dan Pemecahan Masalah Calon Guru Smk Program Keahlian Tata Boga. Disertasi. Tidak dipublikasikan.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/eksakta.v7i1.174-184

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 27 times
PDF - 15 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.