ANALISIS SOAL-SOAL PENILAIAN HARIAN DALAM LKS MATA PELAJARAN MATEMATIKA SMA TERBITAN PT PENERBIT INTAN PARIWARA BERDASARKAN TAKSONOMI BLOOM REVISI

Zuhri Fatihatu Rohmah, Budiyono Budiyono, Waryanti Ika Purwaningsih

Abstract


This research aims to describe the cognitive level and the percentage of daily assessment multiple choices on worksheet Mathematics subjects in class XI semester 1 semester based on Bloom's revised Taxonomy. The number of questions analyzed is 34 questions out of 149 multiple choice questions. The cognitive level of Bloom's revised Taxonomy includes the processes of remembering (C1), understanding (C2), applying (C3), analyzing (C4), evaluating (C5), and creating (C6). The type of research used is descriptive qualitative content analysis techniques. The data source in this study is a multiple choice daily assessment on the LKS mathematics subjects in class XI semester 1 published by PT Publit Intan Pariwara. Data collection techniques in this study is documentation. The documents used were daily assessment questions on the first semester XI high school mathematics LKS published by PT Publisher Intan Pariwara and the revised Bloom Taxonomy cognitive level. The data technique used are Miles and Hubermen model. The results of the analysis show that the cognitive level of questions in the LKS Mathematics High School subjects based on the cognitive level of understanding (C2) as many as 18 (52.94%) questions, applying (C3) as many as 12 (35.29%) questions, analyzing (C4) as many as 4 (12.12%) questions, and at the cognitive level remembering (C1), evaluating (C2), and creating (C6) there were no problems at this cognitive level. So that it can be seen that the daily assessment questions is  not fulfilled the cognitive level of Bloom Taxonomy so there is a need for training in compiling questions in the worksheet in order to cover all cognitive levels of the revised Bloom Taxonomy and the learning objectives are achieved


Keywords


Revised Bloom's taxonomy, a matter of daily valuation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L. W. Dan Krathwohl, D. R. 2010. Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Depdiknas. 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Lubis, S. S., Syarifuddin, dan Dongoran, H. 2017. Analisis Butir Soal Dan Kemampuan Siswa Menjawab UN Dan UAS Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Biologi Kelas XI SMAN/MAN Di Kota Medan. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan. Volume 5, No. 3.

Majid, A. 2014. Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Masduki, dkk. 2013. Level Kognitif Soal-soal Buku Pelajaran Matematika SMP. Prosiding seminar nasional matematika Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UNY.

Ngapiningsih, dkk. 2019. Matematika Untuk SMA/MA Mata Pelajaran Wajib. Yogyakarta: PT Penerbit Intan Pariwara.

Prastowo, A. 2015. Panduan Kreatif Membuaat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Yogyakarta: DIVA Press.

Provansnik, S., Kastberg, D., Ferraro, D., Lemanski, N., Roey, S., and Jenkins, F. 2012. Highlights From TIMSS 2011: Mathematics and Science Achievement of U. S. Fourth-and English-Grade Students in an International Context (NCES 2013-009). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Departement of Education. Washington, DC.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/eksakta.v6i1.37-41

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 563 times
PDF - 321 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.