ANALISIS AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW BERBANTUAN LKPD BERBASIS KASUS
Abstract
Pembelajaran IPA dapat membantu siswa belajar untuk mengumpulkan informasi yang relevan berdasarkan kehidupan nyata dan mengubah informasi tersebut menjadi pengetahuan. Hal ini menjadikan pentingnya siswa belajar aktif melalui permasalahan pada kehidupan sehari-hari. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui keterlaksanaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw. Design penelitian yang digunakan, yaitu observation research dengan 30 partisipan yang berasal dari siswa kelas VIII di salah satu SMP di Sidoarjo. Teknik pengumpulan yang digunakan adalah observasi dengan lembar keterlaksanaan pembelajaran. Data yang didapatkan kemudian dianalisis menggunakan Cohen’s Kappa coefficient (ĸ) untuk melihat kesepakatan antar pengamat. Selama tiga kali pertemuan pembelajaran terlaksana dengan sangat baik. Siswa terlibat aktif sehingga berdampak pada naiknya hasil belajar. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut meskipun terdapat limitasi, dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dengan LKPD berbasis kasus terlaksana dengan baik yang berdampak pada meningkatnya hasil belajar siswa.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings, educational and psychological measurument. Journal Articles: Reports-Research: Numerical/Quantitative Data, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Akcay, E. C., Boz, S. C., & Cakiroglu, H. (2018). Effectiveness of inquiry-based learning in improving science achievment and interest in science: Evidence from a meta-analytic review. Eurasio Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 33-55. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2018.00084a
Alimah, S., & Utami, L. (2019). Human reproduction contextual case-based worksheet to improve students’ interpersonal communication and collaboration skills. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 11(2), 256–263. https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v11i2.19760
Allen, D. E., & Duch, B. J. (2015). The power of problem-based learning in teaching science introductory courses. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 6(2), 235-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2015.1054100
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning teaching and assesing; A revisian of bloom’s taxonomy of education objectives. Addison Wesley Lonman
Aronson, E., & Bridgeman, D. (1979). Jigsaw groups and the desegregated classroom: In pursuit of common goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5(4), 438–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727900500405.
Aronson, E., Stephen, C., Sikes, J., Blaney, N., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Sage Publication.
Baken, E. K., Adams, D. C., & Rentz, M. S. (2022). Jigsaw method improves learning and retention for observation-based undergraduate biology laboratory activities. Journal of Biological Education, 56(3), 317–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2020.1796757
Bao, L. & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8
Blaney, N. T., C. Stephan, D. Rosenfield, E. Aronson, and J. Sikes. (1977). Interdependence in the classroom: a field study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(2), 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.69.2.121
Brookhart, S. M., Wilson, K. M., Van Hover, S., & Murphy, J. J. (2016). Assessing the quality of classroom assessments: A comparison of teacher and student ratings. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 35(2), 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12122
Dogan, Y., Dogan, F. M., & Ozdilek, E. S. (2015). The effectiviness of a new learning model on student’s knowledge gain and attitudes towards science courses. Research in science & Technological Education, 33(2), 206-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1031265
Doymus, K. (2017). The effect of cooperative learning on students’ mathematics achievement and attitude towards. Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 169-355. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.6.347-355
Fraenkel, J. R., Norman, E. W., & Helen, H. H. (2023). How to design and evaluate research in education. In McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Frankl, S., Newman, L., Burgin, S., Atasoylu, A., Fishman, L., Gooding, H., Kamin, D., Puig, A., Thomas, A. M., Cohen, D., & Schwartzstein, R. (2017). The case-based collaborative learning peer observation worksheet and compendium: An evaluation tool for flipped classroom facilitators. The Journal of Teaching and Learning Resources, 13, https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10583
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
Hakkarainen, K., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2022). Learning by inventing: Theoretical foundations. Invention pedagogy, 15–27. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/97810 03287360-3
Hao, H., Susono, H., Geng, X., Chen, L., & Yamada, M. (2023). Effects of using the first principles of instruction in yanga content and language integrated learning class. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00173-2
Hoorani, B. H. (2019). Impact of cooperative learning in developing students’ cognitive abilities for academic achievment. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 1(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.vli2.41
Jablonski-Momeni, A., Stachiniss, V., Ricketts, D.N., Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, M., Pieper, K, (2015). Inter-observer agreement in the assessment ICDAS-II criteria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 49(4), 313-323. https://doi.org.10.1159/000380886
Koretsky, M., Keeler, J., Ivanovitch, J., & Cao, Y. (2018). The role of pedagogical tools in active learning: A case for sense-making. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0116-5
Langlois, J. H., & Prestholdt, P. H. (2010). Information: A control for observer bias. Journal of Social Psychology, 102(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1977.9713249
Lee, S.H., Lee, J., Liu, X., Bonk, C.J. and Magjuka, R.J. (2009). A review of case-based learning practices in an online MBA program: A program-level case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 12(3), 178-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09200-1
McHugh, Mary L. (2012). Interrater Reliability: The Kappa Statistic. Journal Biochemia Medica, 22(3), pp. 276–282. http://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
Miller, E. C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2019). Promoting deep learning through project based learning: a design problem. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(7). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0009-6
Nobles, S., & Paganucci, L. (2015). Do digital writing tools deliver? Student perceptions of writing quality using digital tools and online writing environments. Computers and Composition, 38, 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.001.
Novritasari, B., Setiawan, B., & Mahdiannur, M. A. (2022). Implementation of cooperative learning model teams games tournament to improve student science learning outcome of junior high school. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(5), 650–656. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i5.3716
Pozzi, F. (2010). Using jigsaw and case study for supporting online collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 55(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.003
Santrock, J. W. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and application to fitness and performance. In New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Simaremare, J. A., & Thesalonika, E. (2021). Penerapan metode kooperatif learning tipe jigsaw untuk meningkatkan motivasi dan hasil belajar mahasiswa. Jurnal Tunas Bangsa, 8(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.46244/tunasbangsa.v8i2.1642
Smith, J., Johnson, K., & Brown, L. (2018). Evaluating the construct validity of a self-efficacy scale for physical activity using aiken's validity coefficient technique. Journal of Health Psychology, 23(4), 543-551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316630239
Sormunen, K., & Viilo, M. (2022). Orchestrating invention activities through teacher’s multilayered work. Invention pedagogy, 132–147. https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9781003287360-12
Taherdoost, H. (2018). Validity and reliability of the research instrument: How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. SSRN Electronic Journal, 5(3), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040
Ural, E., Ercan, O., & Gencoglan, D. M. (2017). The effect of jigsaw technique on 6th graders’ learning of force and motion unit and their science attitudes and motivation. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching. 18(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.12973/apfslt.2017.18.01.001
Van Wyk, M. M. (2017). Using the jigsaw teaching strategy for the advance of economics teachers’ kcquisition of Knowledge. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(2), 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2015.11917621
Vazsonyi, A. T., Pickering, L. E., Junger, M., & Hessing, D. (2013). Observer bias in observational research: A review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(1), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.11.009
Woolf, J.L., & Herring, J.R. (2018). The impact of observer bias on teacher evaluation in mathematics classrooms. Journal of Educational Research, 111(2). 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1229041
Yoonkyung, L., & Yongsob, K. (2015). The effect of jigsaw cooperative learning on improving student’s learning achievement and motivation in mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 1229-1240. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1378a
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/eksakta.v8i2.260–267
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 706 timesPDF - 505 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.