UPAYA AMERIKA DALAM MENGHADAPI ANCAMAN TIONGKOK DI LAUT CHINA SELATAN MELALUI PENGAKTIFAN THE QUADRILATERAL SECURITY DIALOGUE (QUAD)

(1) * Vero Alfiansyah Mail (Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia, Indonesia)
(2) Havidz Ageng Prakoso Mail (Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia, Indonesia)
*corresponding author

Abstract


Tujuan penelitian adalah meneliti upaya Amerika melalui The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue dalam menghadapi ancaman Tiongkok di laut China Selatan. Tiongkok telah menjadi ancaman bagi negara utama seperti Amerika dan kawasan Asia di Laut China Selatan. Untuk mencegah dampak Tiongkok di laut China selatan, Amerika membentuk aliansi dialog QUAD. The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD) adalah dialog strategis antara Amerika Serikat, Australia, India dan Jepang yang dikelola oleh pembicaraan antara negara-negara anggota. Dalam menghadapi ancaman Tiongkok di laut China Selatan, artikel ini membahas keunggulan QUAD dalam menghadapi kehadiran Tiongkok di laut China Selatan. Teori utama yang digunakan artikel ini adalah Balance of Threat dari Stephen Walt. Hasil dari artikel ini akan menunjukkan  keunggulan QUAD dari letak geografi, sumber daya, persenjataan, serta program latihan perang bersama. Keunggulan tersebut digunakan QUAD dalam menghadapi kehadiran China di laut China Selatan.


Keywords


Dialog Keamanan Segiempat, Neraca Ancaman, Laut Cina Selatan, Amerika Serikat, Tiongkok.

   

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v9i5.2022.1847-1858
      

Article metrics

10.31604/jips.v9i5.2022.1847-1858 Abstract views : 0 | PDF views : 0

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

References


ASEAN Jubilee Meeting in Manila. (2017). Retrieved from www.indiplomacy.com

Australia Department of Defence. (2018). Australia Department Defence Annual Report 2017 - 2018.

Australian Department of Defence. (2019, April 9). AUSINDEX 2019 commences in India. Australian Government Department of Defence. Retrieved from https://www.minister.defence.gov.au/minister/cpyne/media-releases/ausindex-2019-commences-india

Australian Department of Foreign Affair and Trade. (2019). AUSTRALIA’S IMPORTS OF AIRCRAFT & PARTS – UPDATE FOR 2018. Retrieved from www.abs.gov.au.

Berlie, J. A. (Ed.). (2020). China’s Globalization and the Belt and Road Initiative. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22289-5

China The Secretary Of Defence. (2019). OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China ANNUAL REPORT.

Fravel, M. T. (2011). China’s Strategy in the South China Sea. CONTEMPORARY SOUTHEAST ASIA, 33(3), 292. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs33-3b

Gale, J. B., & Shearer, A. (2017). CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & INTERNATIONAL STUDIES middle east program The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue and the Maritime Silk Road Initiative THE ISSUE.

IISS. (2017). The Military Balance 2017.

IISS. (2018). The Military Balance 2018. The Military Balance, 118(1), 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/04597222.2018.1416963

IISS. (2019). THE MILITARY BALANCE 2019.

India Ministry Of Defence. (2018). Annual Report 2017-18 MINISTRY OF DEFENCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA.

Japan Ministry of Defense. (2019). Defense Programs and Budget of Japan 防 è¡› çœ Ministry of Defense.

Jayachandra Reddy, G. (2010). Australia’s Grand Defence Strategy: Implications for India and Indian Ocean. World Affairs 0971-8052.

Kaura, V. (2020). QUAD’S MALABAR MOMENT. Indian Journal of Asian Affairs, 33(1/2), 1–23. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27003432

Law, W.-W. (2014). Understanding China’s curriculum reform for the 21st century. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(3), 332–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2014.883431

Liu, W. (Ed.). (2018). China’s Belt and Road Initiatives. Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0101-8

Lobell, S. E. (2017). Structural Realism/Offensive and Defensive Realism (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.304

Luthra, G. (2021). The Indo-Pacific Quest for the Quad’ s Spirit.

Madeline McLaughlin. (2021). U.S. Strategy in the South China Sea. Retrieved from https://about.jstor.org/terms

Panda, J. P., & Gunasekara-Rockwell, E. (2021). Quad Plus and Indo-Pacific. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003206408

Peou, S. (2008). Constructivism in Security Studies on Pacific Asia: Assessing Its Strengths and Weaknesses*. Pacific Focus, 17(2), 177–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1976-5118.2002.tb00273.x

Priess, D. (1996). Balanceâ€ofâ€threat theory and the genesis of the gulf cooperation council: An interpretative case study. Security Studies, 5(4), 143–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636419608429291

Rai, A. (2018). Quadrilateral Security Dialogue 2 (Quad 2.0) – a credible strategic construct or mere “foam in the ocean� Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, 14(2), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09733159.2019.1572260

Rao, A. (2021). Is the East Asia quadrilateral sustainable? Asian Politics & Policy, 13(2), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12574

Singhal, G., Bansod, B., & Mathew, L. (2018). Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Classification, Applications and Challenges: A Review Heavy Metals/Metalloids Sensing View project Remote sensing for Precision agriculture View project Unmanned Aerial Vehicle classification, Applications and challenges: A Review. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201811.0601.v1

Taubenfeld, R. (2017). Talisman Saber Exercises. Retrieved from www.peaceconvergence.org,

Taylor, M. P. (2003). Purchasing Power Parity. Review of International Economics, 11(3), 436–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9396.00394

The balance of power: Theory and practice. (1995). The Adelphi Papers, 35(295), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/05679329508449302

The Interim National Security Strategic Guidance. (2021). Retrieved from https://crsreports.congress.gov

US Depatrment of Defence. (2021). US Military Annual Report 2020 - 2021.

US Secretary of Defense. (2019). Military Industrial Capabiliies Annual Report 2018.

US Secretary of the Army. (2018). Winning Through Readiness, Modernization, and Reform Fiscal Year 2018 United States Army Annual Financial Report.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.