(2) Mario Pratama
*corresponding author
AbstractPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah terdapat hubungan antara dukungan teman sebaya dengan student engagement pada mahasiswa di Sumatera Barat. Hipotesis yang diajukan dalam penelitian ini adalah adanya hubungan positif antara dukungan teman sebaya dengan student engagement pada mahasiswa di Sumatera Barat. Peneliti menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan dua skala sebagai alat ukur yaitu skala dukungan teman sebaya (33 item) yang disusun oleh Monica (2018) dan skala student engagaement (22 item) yang disusun oleh Pratama & Guspa (2020). Studi ini mengumpulkan data dari 160 mahasiswa di Sumatera Barat. Data diolah menggunakan analisis statitistik dengan aplikasi SPSS 20. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa korelasi pearson antara dukungan teman sebaya dengan students engagement menunjukkan nilai r sebesar 0,247 dengan nilai p 0,02 (p<0,01). Berdasarkan analisis tersebut dapat diketahui bahwa terdapat hubungan positif yang signifikan antara dukungan teman sebaya dengan student engagement.
Keywordsdukungan teman sebaya, student engagement, mahasiswa, kuantitatif
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v9i2.2022.480-485 |
Article metrics10.31604/jips.v9i2.2022.480-485 Abstract views : 2 | PDF views : 0 |
Cite |
Full Text Download
|
References
Dwyer, K. K., Bingham, S. G., Carlson, R. E., Prisbell, M., Cruz, A. M., & Fuss, D. A. (2004). Communication and connectedness in the classroom: Development of the connected classroom climate inventory. Communication Research Reports, 21(3), 264–272. doi:10.1080/08824090409359988
Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (1999). The revised learning indicators scale. Communication studies, 50, 1-12.
Johnson, Z. D., & LaBelle, S. (2016). Student-to-student confirmation in the college classroom: An initial investigation of the dimensions and outcomes of students’ confirming messages. Communication Education, 65(1), 44– 63. doi:10.1080/03634523.2015.1058961
Kuh, G. H. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706. doi:10.1353/csd.0.0099
Kuh, G. H., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563. doi:10.1353/jhe.0.0019
LaBelle, S., & Johnson, Z. D. (2018). Student-to-student confirmation in the college classroom: The development and validation of the student-to- student confirmation scale. Communication Education, 67(2), 185–205. doi:10.1080/03634523.2018.1427879
Labelle, S., & Johnson, Z. D. (2020). The relationship of students-to-student confirmation and student engagement. Communication Research Reports, 1-9. doi 10.1080/08824096.2020.1823826
Mazer, J. P. (2012). Development and validation of the student interest and engagement scales. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 99–125.doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.679244
Mazer, J. P. (2013). Validity of the student interest and engagement scales: Associations with student learning outcomes. Communication Studies, 64(2), 125–140. doi:10.1080/10510974.2012.727943
Mazer, J. P., & Thompson, B. (2011). The validity of the student academic support scale: Associations with social support and relational closeness. Communication Reports, 24(2), 74–85. doi:10.1080/08934215.2011.622237
Mead, S., Hilton, D., & Curtis, L. (2001). Peer support: A theoritical perspective.Psychiatry Rehability, 25(2), 1-29.
Palanta, A. (2020). Data perguruan tinggi tinggi di sumatera barat. Data Langgam, diakses melalui https://langgam.id/data-perguruan-tinggi-di- sumatera-barat/
Santrock, J. W. (2003). Adolescence perkembangan remaja. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Sidelinger, R. J., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2010). Co-constructing student involvement: An examination of teacher confirmation and student-to student connectedness in the college clasroom. Communication Education, 59 (2), 165-184. doi 10.1080/03634520903390867
Sollito, M., Johnson, Z. D., & Myers, S. A. (2013). Students’ perceptions of college classroom connectedness, assimilation, and peer relatiohship. Communication Education, 62(3), 318-331.doi 10.1080/03634523.2013.788726
Solomon, P. (2004). Peer support/ peer provide service underlying processes, benefits and critical ingredients. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27 (4), 392-401.
Yahya, M., & Bahri, S. (2016). Identifikasi masalah-masalah yang dialami mahasiswa fakultas teknik dan ekonomi unsyiah. JURNAL SULOH, 1 (1), 10-18.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.






Download