PEMBERDAYAAN ATAU PENGECUALIAN? TINJAUAN SOSIO-HISTORIS DAMPAK OTONOMI KHUSUS PAPUA TERHADAP KELOMPOK MINORITAS

(1) * Nurdiani Fathiraini Mail (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia)
(2) Nour Muhammad Adriani Mail (Kiprah Research Centre, Indonesia)
(3) Labibatussolihah Labibatussolihah Mail (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia)
*corresponding author

Abstract


Isu Papua Barat, yang ditandai dengan pelanggaran hak asasi manusia dan gerakan separatis, menimbulkan tantangan signifikan bagi Indonesia. Undang-undang otonomi khusus, yang bertujuan untuk merespons tuntutan separatis, telah menyebabkan perpecahan dalam masyarakat dan diskriminasi hukum, terutama dalam bidang ketenagakerjaan dan kebebasan beragama. Studi ini mengeksplorasi konteks historis dan isu kontemporer terkait otonomi khusus di Papua Barat, dengan fokus pada implementasi otonomi khusus, diskriminasi hukum, dan dampaknya terhadap identitas lokal. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan ketegangan yang terus berlanjut dan pelanggaran hak asasi manusia yang diperparah oleh regulasi diskriminatif dan tantangan administratif. Meskipun upaya telah dilakukan untuk mengatasi masalah Papua, diskriminasi sistemik dan kekerasan tetap berlangsung, menghambat kemajuan menuju inklusivitas dan pemerintahan yang efektif. Dengan menggunakan metode deskriptif historis dan kualitatif, studi ini menganalisis sumber primer dan sekunder untuk memahami akar penyebab dan implikasi dari isu-isu tersebut. Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa mengatasi diskriminasi, mempromosikan inklusivitas, dan melindungi hak asasi manusia bagi semua penduduk asli Papua sangat penting untuk menyelesaikan masalah Papua Barat. Meski demikian, menjamin kesetaraan hak bagi semua warga Indonesia yang telah lama bermukim di sana juga harus diprioritaskan. Hanya dengan pendekatan ini, perdamaian dan pembangunan berkelanjutan di kawasan tersebut dapat dicapai.


Keywords


diskriminasi; hak asasi manusia; minoritas; otonomi khusus; Papua Barat

   

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v12i1.2025.139-148
      

Article metrics

10.31604/jips.v12i1.2025.139-148 Abstract views : 0 | PDF views : 0

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

References


Amnesty International. (2017). Amnesty International Report 2016/17 The State of the World’s Human Right. London: Amnesty International Ltd.

Asia Report. (2008). Indonesia: Communal Tensions in Papua. Crisis Group Asia Report, 154 (16), June, 1-31.

Brundige, E., King, W., Vahali, P., Vladeck, S., Yuan, X. (2004). Indonesian Human Rights Abuses in West Papua: Application of the Law of Genocide to the History of Indonesian Control. Academic Paper. New Haven: Yale Law School.

Buchanan, C. & Cooper, A (eds.). (2011). Conflict Management in Indonesia – An Analysis of the Conflicts in Maluku, Papua and Poso. Geneva: Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue.

Elmslie, J. (2010). West Papuan Demographic Transition and the 2010 Indonesian Census: “Slow Motion Genocide†or not? CPACS Working Paper 11/1, Sydney: The West Papua Project at the Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies, The University of Sydney.

Elmslie, J. (2017). The Great Divide: West Papuan Demographics Revisited; Settlers Dominate Coastal Regions but the Highlands Still Overwhelmingly Papuan. The Asia-Pacific Journal, 15(2)(1), January, 1-12.

Gietzelt, D. (1989). The Indonesianization of West Papua. Journal of Oceania, 59(3), March, 201-221.

Halmin, M. Y. (2006). The Implementation of Special Autonomy in West Papua, Indonesia: Problems and Recommendations (Master’s thesis). Monterey: Naval Postgraduate School.

Hedman, E. E. (2006). Dynamics of Conflict and Displacement in Papua, Indonesia (RSC Working Paper No. 42). Oxford: Department of International Development, University of Oxford.

Hidayat, M. S. (2001). Questioning the Unquestionable: An Overview of the Restoration of West Papua into the Republic of Indonesia. New York: Permanent Mission of the Republic of Indonesia to the United Nations.

Hidayat, R. (2017). Political Devolution: Lessons from a Decentralized Mode of Government in Indonesia. SAGE Open Journal, January-March, 1–11. doi:10.1177/21582440 166868.

Kuntowijoyo. (2003). Metodologi Sejarah (Edisi Kedua). Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Malmambessy, B. (2011). Tinjauan Kritis terhadap Raperda Manokwari ‘Kota Injil’ [Critical Review on Proposed Local Regulation Manokwari ‘Bible City’]. Toleransi, 3(1), January-June, 1-18.

McGibbon, R. (2006). Pitfalls of Papua Understanding the Conflict and Its Place in Australia–Indonesia Relations (Lowy Institute Paper 13), Sydney: Lowy Institute for International Policy.

Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. and Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. London: Sage.

Ministry of Law and Human Right, Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Papua [Papua Provincial Decree] no 4 year 2013, 6, 9-11, ccessed 6 November 2017

Morin, I. (2016). Marginalizing and revaluing Papuan Malay: The impact of politics, policy and technology in Indonesia. Tilburg Papers in Cultural Studies Paper 159. Tilburg: Tilburg University.

Rollings, L. B. (2010). The West Papua Dilemma (Master’s thesis). Wollongong: School of History and Politics, University of Wollongong.

Sjamsuddin, H. (2007). Metodologi Sejarah (Edisi Kedua). Yogyakarta: Ombak.

Slama, M. (2015). Papua as an Islamic Frontier: Preaching in ‘the Jungle’ and the Multiplicity of Spatio-Temporal Hierarchisations. In Slama, M. & Munro, J. (Eds.), From 'Stone-Age' to 'Real-Time' Exploring Papuan Temporalities, Mobilities and Religiosities (pp. 243-270). Canberra: ANU Press,

Tebay, N. (2011). Jakarta-Papua dialogue and community participaton. In King, P., Elmslie, J. & Webb-Gannon, C. (Eds.), Comprehending West Papua (pp.129-147). Sydney: Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies, University of Sydney.

Trajano, J. C. I. (2010). Ethnic Nationalism and Separatism in West Papua, Indonesia. Journal of Peace, Conflict and Development, 16, November, 12-35.

UU Nomor 21 Tahun 2001 tentang Otonomi Khusus Papua, accessed 6 November 2017

UU Nomor 35 Tahun 2008 tentang Otonomi Khusus Papua, accessed 7 November 2017

Viartasiwi, N. (2014). Autonomy and Decentralization as Remedies?: Counterinsurgency Tactics for the West Papua Conflict in Democratic Indonesia. Ritsumeikan Annual Review of International Studies, 27(1), June, 283-304.

DPR Minta Penegak Hukum Jamin Keamanan Idul Adha di Tolikara [DPR Asks Authority to Guarantee the Security of Eid al-Adha in Tolikara]. (2015, September 9th). Harian Terbit. Retrieved from http://nasional.harianterbit.com/nasional/2015/09/09/41025/43/25/DPR-Minta-Penegak-Hukum-Jamin-Keamanan-Idul-Adha-di-Tolikara

FPDMPMJ Demo Tolak John Banua Maju Pilkada [FPDMPMJ Demonstration Rejecting John Banua Candidacy in Election]. (2017, July 5th). Tabloidjubi. Retrieved from http://tabloidjubi.com/m/artikel-7505-fpdmpmj-demo-tolak-john-banua-maju-pilkada.html

Komnas HAM finds human rights violations in Tolikara incident. (2015, August 11th). The Jakarta Post. Retrieved from http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/08/11/komnas-ham-finds-human-rights-violations-tolikara-incident.html

Pembakar Gereja Dihukum 5 Tahun, Pembakar Masjid Tolikara Hanya Dihukum 2 Bulan [Church Burner Sentenced to 5 Years, Tolikara Mosque Burner Only Sentenced to 2 Months]. (2016, February 22nd). Nahimunkarmedia. Retrieved from https://www.nahimunkar.org/pembakar-gereja-dihukum-5-tahun-pembakar-masjid-tolikara-dihukum-2-bulan/

Yogyakarta’s tolerance image at stake. (2016, November 7th). The Jakarta Post. Retrieved from https://www.pressreader.com/indonesia/the-jakartapost/20160815/281505045617920


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.