Email this article 
(Muhammadiyah University of Kudus, Indonesia)(2) Eka Kurniawati
(Muhammadiyah University of Kudus, Indonesia)(3) Fathimah Isnina
(Muhammadiyah University of Kudus, Indonesia)*corresponding author
AbstractThis study aims to describe the kinds of language variations used by transgender individuals in Jl. Bungtomo Denpasar, Bali. This research applied field observation and was supported by interviews and recording techniques. The result shows that transgender language in Denpasar, Bali, can be categorized into singular subject, question word, demonstrative pronoun, noun, verb, adjective, and adverb. The phenomenon of language used by transgender individuals as their language variation to convey wishes in their social community. They also addressed it in code language to communicate with their social gender. On the other hand, they felt comfortable with their transvestite relationship in daily communication rather than standard language. They also considered that their variation of language is their own language that other people will not understand what is being said by them. This language was not born in the safe space of an intergovernmental association, but it was used in the dark area of transvestite prostitution. According to them, this jargon can only be used if it is used by speakers of the language. There are two conditions for encouraging the birth of this language. First, they sold themselves and were afraid of being harassed by their consumers. Second, before the pornography law existed, they realized that their sexuality was deviant. KeywordsLanguage Variations; Transgender Individuals; Social Gender
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.31604/linguistik.v10i4.438-444 |
Article metrics10.31604/linguistik.v10i4.438-444 Abstract views : 0 | PDF views : 0 |
Cite |
Full Text Download
|
References
Bawa, I. W. (224 C.E.). Wibawa Bahasa. Program Pascasarjana (S2-S3) Linguistik Universitas Udayana.
Bartholomaeus, C., & Riggs, D. W. (2017). Transgender people and education. Springer.
Behavioral, M., Factor, R., Survey, S., & Variance, G. (2015). Guidelines for psychological practice with transgender and gender nonconforming people. The American Psychologist, 70(9), 832–864. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039906
Brockenbrough, E. (2016). Becoming queerly responsive: Culturally responsive pedagogy for Black and Latino urban queer youth. Urban Education, 51(2), 170–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085914549261.
Catalano, D. C. J. (2015). “Trans enough?” The pressures trans men negotiate in higher education. Transgender Studies Quarterly, 2(3), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2926399.
Chaer, Abdul dan Agustina, L. (2004). Sosiolinguistik, Perkenalan Awal. Rineka Cipta.
Check, E. (2012). Fenced in/out in West Texas: Notes on defending my queer body. Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, 32(1), 19–41.
Elliot, P. (2010). Debates in transgender, queer, and feminist theory. Routledge
Garvey, J. C. (2017). Considerations for queer as a sexual identity classification in education survey research. Journal of College Student Development, 58(7), 1113 1118. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2017.0088
Girshick, L. B. (2021). Transgender Voices. Transgender Voices, 177–179. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1xx9bnp
Hancock, A. B., & Garabedian, L. M. (2013). Transgender voice and communication treatment: A retrospective chart review of 25 cases. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 48(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00185.x
Holmes, J. (2008). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (Third edition).
Kean, E. (2020). Locating Transgender Within the Language of Queer in Teacher Education. Multicultural Perspectives, 22(2), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2020.1741371
Luhmann, S. (1998). Queering/querying pedagogy? Or, pedagogy is a pretty queer thing. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Queer theory ineducation (pp. 141–155). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Love, H. (2014). Queer. Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1(1–2), 172–176. https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2399938
Malmquist, A., Gustavson, M., & Schmitt, I. (2013). Queering School, queers in school: An introduction. Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics, 1(2), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.3384/confero.2001-4562.13v1i21g
Martin, J. . (1993). Genre and Literacy Modeling Context in Educational Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Namaste, V. (2000). Invisible lives: The erasure of transgendered and transsexual people. University of Chicago Press.
Pateda, Mansoer. 1981. Sosiolinguistik. Bandung: Angkasa.
Prosser, J. (1998). Second skins: The body narratives of transsexuality. Columbia University Press.
Salamon, G. (2010). Assuming a body: Transgender and rhetorics of materiality. Columbia University Press.
Solihin. (2005). Kepada Para Waria. Al Azhar Press.
Staley, S., & Leonardi, B. (2016). Leaning in to discomfort: Preparing literacy teachers for gender and sexual diversity. Research in the Teaching of English, 51(2), 209–229.
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Aanalisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistik. Duta Wacana University Press.
Sumarsono. (2008). Sosiolinguistik. SABDA (Lembaga Studi Agama, Budaya dan Perdamaian).
Webster, L. (2019). “i am I”: Self-constructed transgender identities in internet-mediated forum communication. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2019(256), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-2015
Zacko-Smith, J. D., & Smith, G. P. (2010). Recognizing and utilizing queer pedagogy: A call for teacher education to reconsider the knowledge base on sexual orientation for teacher education programs. Multicultural Education, 18(1), 2–9.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Linguistik: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra
issn online : 2548-9402 | issn cetak : 2541-3775
Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan
Jl.Stn Mhd Arief No 32 Padangsidimpuan, Sumatera Utara
Email: jurnal.linguistik@um-tapsel.ac.id