
*corresponding author
AbstractThis study investigates how nature is represented in English learning material used at the Kindegarden level and explores the ecolinguistic values embedded within them. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, the research analyzed flashcards, sturybooks, songs, and visual aids implemented at the Nazhrul Asrofi Education Foundation. Data were collected through document analysis and classroom observation, and examined using Stibbe’s ecolinguistic framework supported by semiotic analysis. The findings revealed that nature is frequently present in the materials, especially through depictions of animals, plants, and natural elements. Some materials conveyed positive ecological values such as harmony, care, and interdependence, while others treated nature merely as decorative or neutral content. The role of teachers was found to be essential in transforming passive representations into active ecological learning experiences. This study highlights the need for English teaching resources at the early childhood level to be ecologically conscious and intentionally designed to foster environmental awareness through language. It also emphasizes the importance of teacher involvement in interpreting and delivering ecolinguistic messages to young learners. Keywordsecolinguistics, environmental awareness, Kindegarden
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.31604/linguistik.v10i3.421-425 |
Article metrics10.31604/linguistik.v10i3.421-425 Abstract views : 0 | PDF views : 0 |
Cite |
Full Text![]() |
References
Bowen, G. A. (2009). “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27 – 40.
Cameron, L. (2003). Teaching languages to Young Learners. Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman.
Fill, A., & Muhlhausler, P. (2001). The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment. Continuum.
Fitriani, R. (2020). “Ecolinguistic Values in Indonesian Textbooks: A Critical Analysis.” Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 9(2), 115 – 123.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1990). “New Ways of Meaning: A Challenge to Applied Linguistics.” Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 7 – 36.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. Routledge.
Moon, J. (2000). Children Learning English. Macmillan Education.
Ningsih, L. (2022). “Metaphors of Nature in Children’s Literature: An Ecolinguistic View.” Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 51 – 60.
Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. Routledge.
Yuliani, D. (2021). “Teaching Ecology Through English Songs: A Classroom-Based Study.” English Language Teaching Journal, 10(1), 41 – 50.
UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Linguistik: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra
issn online : 2548-9402 | issn cetak : 2541-3775
Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan
Jl.Stn Mhd Arief No 32 Padangsidimpuan, Sumatera Utara
Email: jurnal.linguistik@um-tapsel.ac.id