The Impact of Pre-Question Techniqueon Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievment at SMA N 1 Pegajahan

(1) * Bella Puspita Sari Mail (Universitas Pembinaan Masyarakat Indonesia, Indonesia)
(2) Puji Hariati, Nurhalimah Mail (Universitas Pembinaan Masyarakat Indonesia, Indonesia)
*corresponding author

Abstract


The aim of this research was to investigate the impact of the pre-question technique on students' reading comprehension achievement at SMA N 1 Pegajahan. This research used a quasi-experimental design involving two classes: control class X-2 and experimental class X-4, each consisting of 36 students. The control class was taught using conventional methods, while the experimental class was given pre-question techniques during reading learning. The results showed that there were significant differences in post-test scores between the two groups. The average value of the control class is (77.22) while the standard deviation is (16.01). Meanwhile, the experimental class has an average value (95.57) with a standard deviation (7.71). The t-test analysis shows that the calculated t-value exceeds the t-table (6.6526) critical value for degrees of freedom (70) at the significance level (0.05) which confirms that the pre-question technique has a statistically significant positive effect on students' reading comprehension achievement.


   

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31604/linguistik.v10i1.16-23
      

Article metrics

10.31604/linguistik.v10i1.16-23 Abstract views : 0 | PDF views : 0

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

References


Adams, L., & Brown, M. (2020). The role of pre-reading questions in improving high school students' comprehension skills. Journal of Literacy Research, 52(1), 45-60.

Adams-Gordon, B. L. (2021). The role of questioning in active learning: Techniques for engagement. Educational Leadership Journal, 10(2), 34-45.

Alyousef, H. S. (2005). Teaching reading: A contemporary approach. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 143-151.

Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (2020). The cognitive process of reading comprehension: Connecting new information with prior knowledge. Journal of Literacy and Language Education, 18(3), 78-94.

Biggs, J. (2014). Constructivist approaches to learning: A practical guide. Educational Research Review, 9, 1-13.

Graesser, A. C., Wiemer Hastings, P., & Wiemer Hastings, J. (2001). Inference generation during reading: A review of the literature. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 1-35). San Diego: Academic Press.

Hattie, J. (2021). Questioning as an assessment tool: Enhancing student learning through effective questions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning, 19(3), 150-160.

Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2014). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. IV, pp. 62-99).

Graesser, A. C., Wiemer Hastings, P., & Wiemer Hastings, J. (2001). Inference generation during reading: A review of the literature. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 1-35). San Diego: Academic Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Linguistik: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra

issn online : 2548-9402 | issn cetak : 2541-3775
Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan
Jl.Stn Mhd Arief No 32 Padangsidimpuan, Sumatera Utara
Email: jurnal.linguistik@um-tapsel.ac.id

RTP SLOT