Penyelesaian Sengketa Proses Pemilu Oleh Bawaslu, Tantangan Dan Masa Depan
Abstract
This paper aims to discuss dispute resolution of Election process by Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu), as well as challenges and how to dispute the election process in the future. Act Number 7 of 2017, Article 95 letter d authorized the Election Supervisory Agency to receive, examine, mediate and adjudicate and decide on the resolution of election disputes. This means that based on Act Number 7 of 2017 in resolving disputes over the election process, Bawaslu is given additional authority to conduct mediation and adjudication. Settlement of disputes by Bawaslu is a crown whose existence is awaited by the community in resolving disputes that often occur during the election stage. To answer the challenge and to get to the destination someday Bawaslu becomes the Election Court, then Bawaslu must immediately build facilities to maintain the effectiveness and capacity of Regional Bawaslu, especially District / City Bawaslu to bemore active in training their abilities and their mentaly, which are still low in resolving election disputes.
Key  words:  Dispute  resolution,  General  election,  Election  Supervisory Agency.
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Dahlan Thaib, (1993), Implementasi Sistem Ketatanegaraan Menurut UUD 1945, Yogyakarta : Liberty,
Didik Sukriono, (2009), Menggagas Sistem Pemilihan Umum, Jurnal Konstitusi PKK Universitas Kanjuruhan Malang Volume II Nomor 1, Juni
Jimly Asshiddiqie, (1994), Gagasan Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Konstitusi dan Pelaksaannya di Indonesia Pergeseran Keseimbangan Antara Individualisme dan Kolektivitisme dalam Kebijakan Demokrasi Politik dan Demokrasi Ekonomi Selama Tiga Masa Demokrasi, 1945-1980-an, Jakarta : PT Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve.
Jimly Asshiddiqie (2010). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Kemitraan, (2011), Penanganan Sengketa Pemilu, Buku 16, Jakarta : Kemitraan bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan.
Ramlan Surbakti, dkk, (2008), Perekayasaan Sistem Pemilu untuk Pembangunan Tata Politik Demokratis, Cet I, Jakarta: Kemitraan.
Refly Harun, Rekonstruksi Kewenangan Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 13, Nomor 1, Maret 2016.
Sri Soemantri M, (1998), Perngantar Perbandingan Hukum Tata Negara, Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.
Takdir Rahmadi, (2011), Mediasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Pendekatan Mufakat, Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.
Topo Santoso, dkk, (2006), Penegakan Hukum Pemilu Praktik Pemilu 2004, Kajian Pemilu 2009-2014, Jakarta : Perludem.
Veri Junaidi, dkk, (2015), Evaluasi Penegakan Hukum Pemilu 2014, Jakarta : Yayasan Perludem.
Winardi, (2007), Managemen Konflik (Konflik Perubahan dan Pengembangan), Bandung : Mandar Maju.
International IDEA, (2010), Keadilan Pemilu: Ringkasan Buku AcuanInternational IDEA,https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/electoral- justice-handbook-overview-ID.pdf, diakses tanggal 22 September 2018.
Mohammad Dawam, Prospek Penanganan Sengketa Pemilu 2019, https://Komisi%20Informasi%20-%20PROSPEK%20PENANGANAN% 20SENGKETA %20PEMILU%202019.html, diakses pada tanggal 22 Septembr 2018.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilu di Daerah Belum Maksimal, http://www.teropongsenayan.com/81715-penyelesaian-sengketa-
pemilu-di-daerah-belum-maksimal, diakses pada tanggal 22 September 2018.
Saldi Isra, (2016), Memastikan Pembaruan Hukum, Media Online Gagasan Hukum, https://gagasanhukum.wordpress.com/tag/saldi-isra/, diakses tanggal 20 September 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v1i2.1-14
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora