ANALISIS AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA DENGAN INTERVENSI PEMBELAJARAN OPEN INQUIRY BERBANTUAN MEDIA PhET SIMULATIONS

Treeas Adinda Rahmawati, Martini Martini, Muhamad Arif Mahdiannur

Abstract


Hands-on, student-centered experiential learning can foster motivation and interest that can develop students' competencies in accommodating skill development, content comprehension, and assimilation of new knowledge. The purpose of this study is to determine the implementation and learning activities of open inquiry assisted by PhET Simulations media. This study uses an observational research design involving 18 grade VIII students. Data collection is carried out by observation. The results of the study showed that the implementation and learning activities using the open inquiry learning model assisted by PhET Simulations media during the three meetings were carried out at all stages and the results of active instruction observation were more dominant. Students are very enthusiastic during learning activities in conducting experiments to complete assignments, and discussions with their groups. Based on this presentation, it can be concluded that the intervention of the open inquiry learning model assisted by PhET Simulations media in the learning process has a great impact on students. Students become active and directly involved in learning, and emphasize direct experience to students so that they can construct knowledge and have an impact on the training of students' proposing action and interpreting result skills. This learning model can be a good alternative for teachers in teaching in the classroom.

Keywords


Open inquiry, PhET Simulations, Aktivitas Pembelajaran

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abaniel, A. (2021). Enhanced conceptual understanding, 21st century skills and learning attitudes through an open inquiry learning model in physics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1004

Adler, I., Zion, M., & Rimerman-Shmueli, E. (2019). Fostering teachers’ reflections on the dynamic characteristics of open inquiry through metacognitive prompts. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(7), 763–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1627060

Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.00 8

Baur, A., & Emden, M. (2021). How to open inquiry teaching? an alternative teaching scaffold to foster students’ inquiry skills. Chemistry Teacher International, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2019-0013

Bugingo, J. B., Yadav, L. L., & Mashood, K. K. (2022). Representation of nature of science aspects in secondary school physics curricula in east african community countries. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(8), 175-201. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.8.11

Correia, A., Koehler, N., Thompson, A., Phye, G., Koehler, N., Thompson, A., Phye, G., & Koehler, N. (2018). The application of PhET simulation to teach gas behavior on the submicroscopic level : secondary school students ’ perceptions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 00(00), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1487834

Chen, J., Wang, M., Grotzer, T. A., & Dede, C. (2018). Using a three-dimensional thinking graph to support inquiry learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55 (9), 1239–1263. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21450

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801

Du, H., & Gu, X. (2020). Exploring a blended mobile learning environment to develop student' scientific inquiry skills in science museums. Internasional Journal of Smart Techology and Learning, 1(4), 310-322. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v7i1.4869

Ellwood, R., & Abrams, E. (2018). Student’s social interaction in inquiry-based science education: How experiences of flow can increase motivation and achievement. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(2), 395–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9769-x

Engudar, N. A., Sarioğlan, A. B., & Dolu, G. (2020). The effect of open inquiry learning on gifted students’ conceptual understanding. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v7i1.4869

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2023). How to design and evaluate research in education. In MCGraw-Hill Higher Education (11 th). McGrraw Hill LLC,1325 Avenue of the Americas.

Gentner, D., & Colhoun, J. (2008). Analogical processes in human thinking and learning (Vol. 2). Springer-Verlag.

Golder, J., & Bengal, W. (2018). Constructivism : a paradigm for. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR), 5(3), 678–686. https://ijrar.org/papers/IJRAR1903214

Haryadi, R., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). PhET simulation software-based learning to improve science process skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022017

Hastuti, E. S., & Hidayati, H. (2018). Pengaruh penggunaan metode eksperimen ditinjau terhadap hasil belajar IPA dari kemampuan komunikasi. Natural: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.30738/natural.v5i1.2562

Ho, Y., Chen, B., & Li, C. (2023). Thinking more wisely: Using the socratic method to develop critical thinking skills amongst healthcare students. BMC Medical Education, 23(173), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04134-2

Jayakusuma, L. I. (2023). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran ipa dengan pendekatan pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing pada siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sains Indonesia, 6(1), 1-8. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPPSI/article/ view/58204

Jimoyiannis, A., & Koletsa, K. (2018). The effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ approaches to learning in science: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(4), 961-989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9424- 3

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3&4), 85-118. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID: 145415261

Mahdiannur, M. A., Romadhoni, W., Mahdiannur, M. A., Romadhoni, W. (2020). Evaluation of senior high school students’ scientific inquiry skills: a perspective from proposing action and interpreting results. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 80–86. http://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jppipa

Mehroz, N. D. (2017). Learning_theories_behaviorism_cognitivis. International Education & Research Journal (IERJ), 3(9), 64–66.

Mentzer, G. A., Czerniak, C. M., & Duckett, T. R. (2019). Comparison of two alternative approaches to quality STEM teacher preparation: Fast-track licensure and embedded residency programs. School Science & Mathematics, 119(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12314

Moebius-Clune, B. N., Elsevier, I. H., Crawford, B. A., Trautmann, N. M., Schindelbeck, R. R., & Es, H. M. (2011). Moving authentic soil research into high school classrooms: Student engagement and learning. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 40(1), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.4195/ jnrlse.2010.0019k

Moore, E.B., Herzog, T. A., & Perkir, K.K. (2013). Interactive simulations as implicit support for guided-inquiry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 257-268. DOI: 10.1039/c3rp20157k

Mutlu, A. (2020). Evaluation of students’ scientific process skills through reflective worksheets in the inquiry-based learning environments. Reflective Practice, 21(2), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2020.1736999

Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199

Perkins, K. (2020). Transforming stem learning at scale: phet interactive simulations. Childhood Education, 96(4), 42-49,4056. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2020.1796451

Prameswari, N. S., Saud, M., Amboro, J. L., & Wahyuningsih, N. (2020). The motivation of learning art & culture among students in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.180977 0

Price, J., Kubacka, K., Gambhir, G., Guevara, M., & Hine, S. (2022). Understanding the classroom: A guide to selecting classroom observation tools. National Foundation for Educational Research.

Rahayu, M. D., Adela, M., Rahayu, D., Habinsaran, P., Samudra, U., Meurandeh, J., & Lama, L. (2020). Perbedaan model pembelajaran open inquiry dan guided inquiry berdasarkan kemandirian belajar dan berfikir tingkat tinggi pada mata pelajaran biologi kelas XI SMAN 3 – Langsa. 1(1), 143–146.

Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2011). Which type of inquiry project do high school biology students prefer: open or guided? research in science education. Research Science Education, 42(5), 831–848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9222-9

Salame, I. I., & Makki, J. (2021). Examining the use of phet simulations on students’ attitudes and learning in general chemistry ii. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), e2247. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/10966

Salehjee, S. (2020). Teaching science through stories: Mounting scientific enquiry. Early Child Development and Care, 190(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2019.1653554

Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 77–96.

Shaner, A., Watson, S., Bakerman, M., & Buxner, S. (2018). ExMASS: A viable model for authentic student-scientist research partnerships. Acta Astronautica, 152, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.07.031

Simons, K. D., & Klein, J. D. (2007). The impact of scaffolding and student achievement levels in a problem-based learning environment. Instructional Science, 35, 41–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9002-5

Taibu, R., Mataka, L., & Shekoyan, V. (2021). Using PhET simulations to improve scientific skills and attitudes of community college students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(3), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.46328/IJEMST.1214

Uum, M. S. J. Van, Verhoeff, R. P., & Peeters, M. (2017). Inquiry-based science education : scaffolding pupils ’ self-directed learning in open inquiry. Internasional Journal of Science Education, 39(18), 2461-2481. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1388940

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.

Wen, C.-T., Liu, C.-C., Chang, H.-Y., Chang, C.-J., Chang, M.-H., Fan Chiang, S.-H., Hwang, F.-K. (2020). Students’ guided inquiry with simulation and its relation to school science achievement and scientific literacy. Computers & Education, 103830(149), 1-14 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103830

World Bank Group. (2015). Conducting classroom observations:analyzing classroom dynamics and instructional time using the stallings "classroom snapshot" observation system. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/education/brief/conducting-classroom-observations-analyzing-classroom-dynamics-and-instructional-time-using-the-stallings-classroom-snapshot-observation-system

Zitzmann, F., & Nehring, A. (2018). Student-centered instruction and learning outcomes in higher education: A meta-analysis reflecting on the contributions of student and teacher characteristics. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 477-508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648- 017-9423-4




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/eksakta.v9i2.287-298

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 340 times
PDF - 148 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.